Coming Soon!

  • Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Pt 2

Sunday, March 27, 2011

Sucker Punch Is an Identity Crisis on Screen

I'll keep this as brief as I can – Sucker Punch is a terrible film! Zach Snyder's latest is an action-packed identity crisis, marketing itself with the eye candy and CGI battle sequences (to draw the guys to the theater) and then, not so subtly, trying to pass it off a something more substantial - a movie with a message. Well, it didn't work. At all. (PS - I went with a group of guys.... the target demographic, and we didn't expect fine art)

It's hard to know where to start. My first reaction is that Snyder has moved on from scantily clad men (300) to scantily clad women with Sucker Punch. I'm not going to lie – eye candy is eye candy and being a guy I appreciated that for what it is. But then to try and sell these insane action sequences as being a metaphor these young womens' struggle to liberate themselves from sex slavery? I'm not buying it. And neither did anyone who was in the theater with me.

The characters in Sucker Punch are paper thin as far as development. They come across as little more than the vehicles to drive the action, and yet, they are supposed to be driving the bigger, important message. Didn't work. The story of these girls banding together to escape their situation is cliché and really does little more than serve as a pause to catch your breath from the action.

And what of the action? I'm confused. I thought this movie was supposed to be about ass-kicking and violence at the hands of hot chicks? So why then, did this movie even try for the PG-13 rating it received? And the way they did it is even more dumbfounding. So here our heroines are, in the midst of an epic World War I-esque battlefield, and in order to make the killing “ok” for the rating, we establish that the German soldiers are already dead and are nothing more than clockwork, steam-punk zombies. What?! It's ok though, we have a “mech” for the asian girl to pilot. Oh man.... what has happened here?

Then for the next epic encounter they take our girls to Isengard! (for your enjoyment) Yes, flying around in a hybrid B-17, the girls somehow end up in Middle Earth where they fight orcs and dragons with samurai swords, assualt rifles and a .50 cal. Oh yeah, and for the sake of that rating thing - “You're one ugly mother....” blam blam blam blam Again, just take the “R” rating and save some shred of dignity.

However, what made this movie truly awful in my opinion is the end, wherein Snyder's story gets sappy and preachy – the message. Seeing as this adventure has already lifted from 95% of animes, The Matrix' wardrobe, Lord of the Rings' locales, Kill Bill's Pei Me sequence and Sky Captain's aesthetic, why not try to shove a message in there too? “You have the tools. Use them.” Cue the eye roll.

If this was supposed to be a movie about female empowerment, which I've read thing that hint that it partially is, it failed. Why? Because this film probably only served to make every teenaged boy (target demographic) in the audience drool. Believe me, they didn't appreciate the “social message” nearly as much as the hot chicks in skimpy outfits kicking ass. If this was supposed to be just a action-packed romp through pop culture, it failed. Drop the pretense! Lose the message, take the “R” rating and just embrace what it is – mindless entertainment, good or bad.

One final thought. This rating thing bothers me on another level too. It managed to snag a PG-13 rating. Why, because it didn't kill “people” en mass or use the word “fuck” in the action sequences? Um.... a fair amount of time is spent in a 40-50s era brothel where the women are abused (verbally and physically) on screen, manipulated, SHOT IN COLD BLOOD and totally objectified (like in the movie itself) and that isn't viewed as violence worthy of “R”? There is nothing wrong with “R” if you understand what it signifies. Gee... I think this movie missed its own contrived message. Sadly, so did the ratings board. Congratulations - you now own the lowest rating ever* for The Film Lounge! 2/10

*Actually tied for the lowest rating ever with a couple other "winners" (Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer, Shrek the Third). The Brothers Solomon, while given a 0/10, was not an official review, just a public service announcement, as stated.

Saturday, February 12, 2011

Looks Like Transformers 3 Isn't the Only Film Dabbling in the 1960s


I'll be honest - the jury is very much still out on this film, given the trailer. X-Men: First Class certainly looks full of potential, but so have a lot of films over the last decade that turned out to underwhelm. Time will tell.

"Howling For You" Music Video is.... Interesting

Saturday, February 5, 2011

Independent Star Wars Documentary Worth a View

IO9 showcased a very interesting and well made independent Star Wars documentary called Star Wars Begins. It is the first in a set of three documentaries covering the original trilogy films hosted via YouTube. I have to give serious props to the creator Jambe Davdar for doing a great job of collecting set footage, deleted and alternate scenes along with a ton of cast and crew interviews. I've done a lot of reading and research into Star Wars over the years and I learned a lot of interesting tidbits watching this! If you're a fan, it is definitely worth watching!

You can check it out over at the creator's YouTube channel where all 14 segments are collected.

Enjoy!

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Inception Dares To Dream

Christopher Nolan's Inception is a movie that fully embraces the definition of “ambition”. The concept, the story, the visuals... everything dreams big and not only succeeds, but soars! Great film making is nothing new from Nolan, who in my opinion has to make a bad film or even a sub-par movie for that matter. He knows his craft, but more than that, he truly understands how to tell a story and connect to his audience.

Inception especially connects with me because its subject matter, dream, is something I truly find fascinating in my own life. I don't know if I would classify myself as a true “lucid” dreamer, but every night I enjoy very vivid dreaming and more often than am somewhat or fully conscious of the fact that I am indeed dreaming. My dream reality is surprisingly consistent and coherent as far as its structure (locations, themes, even continuity... I can recall countless dreams) and so dreaming for me is really like an awesome sandbox. So as I learned more and more about Inception leading up to its release, I was really excited to see it!

It didn't disappoint.

Inception, while relatively simple in its concept, features a very complex plot. It is a myriad of interconnections, character study, layers, mystery and action. Take all that, weave it together with the power of the mind and imagination and you have a very ambitious mix indeed. There is no doubt that Inception demands more than a single viewing to pick up all the details and fully appreciate the nuance throughout. Not only the plot, but the film itself is layer upon layer. It should come as no surprise then that Nolan had been working on Inception on and off for more than a decade. Thankfully, he took his time to realize it, because the film lacks absolutely nothing as a result.

The story is set in modern day (near future?) and assumes that humans have developed technology that allows them to tap into the dream state, even allowing multiple dreamers to share a single dream and fully interact with each other. The mind is the ultimate sanctuary, and with this dream technology comes the ability to steal information right out from someone's mind. This is where our protagonist Dom Cobb (Leonardo DiCaprio) comes in.

Dom is an architect, someone imaginative and skilled enough to literally create the architecture of someone's dream. He is the best in the world and specializes in dream security – he teaches clients how to proactively protect information and the secrets they posses from the would be thief even while asleep. It's a fine job, but Dom has another problem – he is wanted for the murder of his wife and cannot return home to the United States lest he be arrested.

The technology of induced dreaming is not without its risks. Normally, a person hooked up to a dream machine dreams (experiencing accelerated time because of increased brain activity, the brain can process faster while asleep) and then wake up to a “kick”, some sort of signal or physical trigger to wake them up or if they die in the dream. But that is only single level dreaming. It is also possible to create a dream inside a dream where time is accelerated even further and the risks become deadly real because the mind can become lost if the dreamer becomes untethered from reality. If they die in a dream within a dream, they become lost in “limbo” or unstructured dreaming and live a lifetime in the dream before actually dying. They can't wake up because they don't realize they are still dreaming unless they have a totem, a personalized item that acts as a test to let them know when they are dreaming or not.

Dom and his wife explored dreams together and lived a lifetime together in a dreamworld they constructed before ultimately waking up. Only once they returned to reality, Dom's wife Mol became haunted with the notion that she was still dreaming and eventually killed herself in an attempt to wake up. As a result, Mol's memory now haunts Dom's dreams along with the fact that he cannot prove that she killed herself.

However, one man, an energy baron named Saito (Ken Watanabe) has the connections that can wipe Cobb's slate clean and allow him to return home to his two children. All he requires from Dom is the seemingly impossible – inception, or the planting of a foreign idea into someone else' mind all the while making them believe it is their own idea. Allegedly it has never been successfully accomplished and despite the risks, Cobb is certain he can pull it off. You see, he did it to Mol.

Saito's target is a competing business empire that is about to pass from father to son, Maurice Fischer to Robert Fischer (Cillian Murphy). He wants Cobb and his team to plant the idea to break up the business in Robert Fischer's head in order to save his own business from collapsing. At this, Cobb recruits his team: his partner Arthur (Joesph Gorden-Levitt), protogé architect Ariadne (Ellen Page) and associates Eames (Tom Hardy) and Yusuf.

The team develops an intricate plan to put Fischer to sleep on an overseas flight and then infiltrate his dreams... three levels in, an extremely dangerous task. Long story short, they run into serious snags once into the dreaming and the mission suddenly becomes a challenge to survive in addition to achieving inception with Fischer. If they fail, Saito doesn't pull strings and Cobb is arrested upon landing in the US. But what poses the bigger threat – Fischer's mental defenses or Cobb's personal demons?

As previously alluded to, Inception works exceptionally well as an action thriller. Once in the dreamworld, the story keeps a frenetic pace and genuinely keeps the audience guessing what will happen next. There is even a nice homage by Nolan to the ski chase scene in the Bond film On Her Majesty's Secret Service. The visual effects of the film are also beautifully realized, creating a stunning world of the dream and seemingly endless imagination. The film's ability to convey the imagined reality of a dreamscape so successfully is truly an impressive accomplishment! Nolan's talented cast turns in a strong performance to boot.

Inception also features Nolan's signatures of theatrics and diversion. He loves to keep you guessing and second guessing, which I do believe is a key to fully understanding this film. Everyone has their theory as to what really happens and, naturally, after a few viewings and some contemplation, I have my own.

Ultimately, Inception is another hugely successful addition to Nolan's impressive body of work that already includes Memento, Insomnia, Batman Begins, The Prestige, and The Dark Knight. I thoroughly enjoyed this film and it gets my highest recommendation! 10/10


H-DoGG's Theory – SPOILERS

To me, what puts Inception way over the top is what I have come to describe as it's self-manifestation – the film IS a working example of inception for the audience.

The film's final shot with Mol's spinning totem seems to be the focal point for viewer debate and what I see Nolan's final wink. The audience's doubt lingers throughout the film as to whether Cobb is really awake or still stuck inside a dream. We are given little bits of nuance or doubt inducing information that constantly keep us unsure of what actually is real in the back of our mind. So the story plays out and once it reaches the end we want to think Cobb actually made it home, but there is that final shot. Did the totem tip over or spin indefinitely?

How does the notion of inception figure in? Well, we like to pride ourselves the perceptive audience, having picked up all the little clues the film gave us, and ultimately we aren't fooled by the happy ending. And that is just it – we are sure we arrived at that truth all by ourselves – Cobb is still dreaming. We believe it be our own original deduction and idea based on evidence. But it isn't. Nolan planted the idea through the story. Inception. The story actually was a happy ending with Cobb making it home to his children.

Granted this is just my theory, but what cemented it for me was a quote from Nolan I read in a magazine awhile back after seeing the film. To paraphrase, Nolan was asked about the abundant fan theories and notably the ones that say Cobb was still dreaming. His response, “In watching the movie, I didn't take that away from it at all.”