Coming Soon!

  • Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Pt 2

Friday, February 22, 2008

Vantage Point Not What You Expect, Packs Surprises

Having expectations can sometimes prove to be unfortunate, especially with films. When you expect one thing and get another, it can either be pleasantly surprising and enhance a viewing experience or it can hinder than experience. While Vantage Point is a worthwhile and entertaining film, I found that I was a slight bit disappointed due to my own expectations. The film probably isn't exactly what you expect going and it certainly is not predictable. But don't let my experience fool you - its an entertaining film that puts an original story on the screen.

Featuring a star-studded cast including Dennis Quaid, Matthew Fox, Forest Whitaker, Sigourney Weaver and William Hurt as President Ashton, Vantage Point does stay true to its title. It presents us with a modern day scenario - an international anti-terrorism summit where the president of the United States is attacked by terrorists and we witness the alarming events that unfold through eight different perspectives of people who are at the scene.

Where my expectations went wrong is that I was expecting more of a mystery thriller where multiple perspectives would play together to solve the puzzle, perhaps almost JFK-ish. What Vantage Point turned out to be was more of an action thriller that was built less on hiding clues that could actually allow the viewer to solve the puzzle and more of an event dissection that, once at full steam, simply presented the actuality of it all. In fact, Vantage Point turned out to be much more of character-matrix film that showed how every character tied together despite their diverse positions and perspectives. While the ultimate plot turned out to be well devised and entertaining, I found myself a bit disappointed with the character-matrix vehicle because I'm beginning to see it becoming more of a Hollywood fad following in the wake of acclaimed films like 21 Grams, Crash and Babel. The style makes for an intriguing story once in a while, but I fear that if it becomes over-used it will become tired. Frankly, I'm already weary.

Beefs aside, Vantage Point wasn't a bad film. Dennis Quaid's character, rattled Secret Service Agent Thomas Barnes, was interesting and made for an enjoyable protagonist. The action also wasn't bad, featuring a wild car chase through the busy streets of a Spanish city as well as some gun-play throughout. And there are definitely surprises! If you think you know what is really up, don't kid yourself - I'm fairly confident that you will be caught by surprise if you are truly spoiler free.

I have no doubt that Vantage Point will post a successful opening weekend at the box office and if you're looking for an intriguing thriller, you'll most likely be satisfied. Just don't be shocked if it isn't exactly what you expect it to be. 7/10

Wednesday, February 20, 2008

Millennium Actress A Unique and Beautiful Anime

Right around Christmas this past year I finally had the opportunity to dig into the filmography of anime director Satoshi Kon. Readers of the blog probably recall my high praise for Paprika, the film that really got me interested in his stuff. All of his films are very independent of each other and bring their own unique offering to the mix and it goes without saying that the second film I viewed, Millennium Actress, is extremely different from Paprika.

Millennium Actress is a story told through flashback. It is present day and a historical Japanese movie studio is being torn down and TV personality Genya Tochinaba decides to seek out and interview the studio's most legendary actress Chiyoko Fujiwara. Now a recluse, Chiyoko is an old woman living in modest home in the mountains and she hasn't made a public appearance since suddenly vanishing from the public eye some 30 years before. His visit re-unites her with a long lost item - a key given to her by a stranger when she was a girl.

During the course of the interview we follow the life of Chiyoko through the films she made during her illustrious career and we are witness through the eyes of Genya and his cameraman. What we learn is that the key was given to her by a mysterious stranger (an artist and political dissident) that she helped escape from state police during pre-war Japan in the 1930s. Having developed a love for him and always wanting to find and re-unite with him, her roles became a metaphorical representation for her search as her career takes her around the world as well as her own personal development and growth. I suppose, too, that the key could be seen as symbolic of personal freedom... something that the stranger represented and something Chiyoko feels she loses or cannot find with her career. Even so, her search never ends.

The approach Millennium Actress takes to storytelling is probably not new or groundbreaking, but it is nonetheless interesting, albeit a bit confusing at times as reality and fantasy tend to blur, a hallmark of Kon's style. Another similarity to other Kon works is the emphasis on the art of film itself. Actress is no doubt a tribute by Kon to filmmaking itself as evidenced by the subject matter of the film and the care with which it is handled. We see similar thematic elements in Paprika with Detective Kogawa's storyline.

Despite being a bit hard to follow at times, Millennium Actress is a worthwhile title for anime fans to check out. It is a love story of, both of its characters and for filmmaking, and definitely possesses universal elements to appeal to film aficionados. A Kon production, it is beautifully animated with careful attention to detail and a fantastical element that taps into the imagination. I didn't like it as much as Paprika, but it is a great film in it's own right and I can easily recommend it. You probably won't find it at your local movie rental place, but it is available through Amazon and NetFlix. 8/10

Monday, February 18, 2008

The Right Way to See JUMPER - For Free

I freely admit that I had wanted to see Jumper for awhile, since I first saw the trailer. The premise looked intriguing but I fully expected mediocre at best. Turns out that it hit a bit south of mediocre, and that is not good news for star Hayden Christenson, who desperately needs a hit if he is to ever break the Star Wars stigma, you know, the one that relegated Mark Hamil to voice acting (where he does an admittedly super job!), Carrie Fisher to bit roles (Drop Dead Fred, Austin Powers, Charlie's Angels) and Anthony Daniels to a career as a gay robot. Only Harrison Ford emerged from the trilogy a star.

Jumper's problems can be blamed on any number of culprits (bad writing, paper-thin plot, Sam Jackson not dropping a single f-bomb, even for good measure) but bad acting never helps. Christenson, while always trying to sound cool with his awkward delivery, just cannot seem to break out of a very wooden style of "acting". It plagued two Star Wars films (a follow-up to Jake Lloyd's debacle in "the Menace") and now has carried over into his non-Star Wars work. Shattered Glass aside, Hayden is not getting it done. I do not see this changing any time soon.

To be fair, you cannot solely blame Christenson, however. Director Doug Liman should know better - the man directed the first Bourne film and produced the sequels for Pete's sake!!! For him not to realize how poor the writing, casting and plot to Jumper were is irresponsible at best and shameful at worst. This movie is nothing less than an interesting concept handled in the poorest manner possible. And while it wasn't a complete catastrophe, it certainly wasn't good and it certainly wasn't worth paying for. As luck would have it, I didn't. Complimentary theater passes are truly a great thing.

So back to the basics - the central character David (Christenson) discovers he has the ability to "jump" from location to location by sheer force of will. Being a teen with a drunkard father and no mother, he decided to "jump" away from home and start robbing banks so that he can live it up by traveling the globe. Years later he returns home to find his childhood crush (Rachel Bilson) so that he can wisk her off to Rome and win her heart. However, things soon go bad as he runs into other jumpers and "paladins" (led by Jackson), those whose sole reason for existence is to hunt down and kill jumpers, because apparently only God can have the ability to be anywhere at anytime... or so says Sam Jackson, who apparently wanted to take some time off from serious roles... or at least entertaining ones. For a bad-ass, he sure wasn't; at least this time he didn't get his ass killed by Hayden (see Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith).

Granted Jumper had some interesting sequences, but as I've already said it really was a good concept wasted due to complete incompetence, or in the case of Liman and writer David Goyer, dereliction of duty, but we'll get to that later. For example, the jumper power is never explained even a little bit- they have apparently always existed and their war with the paladins has raged just as long (since when did this become Highlander?). I also have to take away points due to a really lame attempt to play the "historical conspiracy" card when one of the characters tells David that the witch hunts and Inquisition were actually the paladins executing their brand of justice on the jumpers. Please.... But apparently jumpers are inherently evil despite the fact that, aside from bank robbing, jumpers don't appear to be serial killers or bent on global domination of any sort. They have the ability to teleport. Ooooohhhh..... EVIL!!!

I must also subtract points because Rachel Bilson's character is perhaps the weakest female lead of a very young 2008 and quite possibly 2009 and 2010 to boot. She seriously needs to pick better roles and David Goyer certainly knows how to write better material. I seem to recall an amazing film from 2005 that he worked on called BATMAN BEGINS! Bilson's character, Millie, was one of the most ignorant, naive and shallow characters I've seen in a long time. At times I just wanted to punch her in the face as she continued to follow and trust a blatantly shady and dishonest David. I guess we can just write her indiscretions off due to be being smitten and besot by a handsome young man who has whisked her off to Rome, the city of her dreams. Hello? McFly?! Anybody home?!!! But it can't be all Bilson's fault. I mean she can only read the lines that are written for her.

Ultimately, nothing is really revealed in Jumper and also nothing is really resolved. In fact, the door was left wide open for a sequel. Anyone stupid enough to pick this up where it left off deserves a flop. As for Hayden Christenson... he is about ready to jump into unemployment and obscurity. 3/10

Before I wrap this review up, I cannot help but wonder aloud how Liman and Goyer could cook up such a piece of garbage, especially in collaboration. As already noted, they have Batman Begins, the Bourne films and Dark City in their combined resume, so how did they go so wrong? I mean, I think the concept of Jumper had potential which is why I was originally interested. But it was a disaster with only fleeting moments of entertainment sprinkled throughout. What a joke!

Saturday, February 16, 2008

New Indiana Jones 4 Trailer Is 'OK', Doesn't Thrill




It debuted on the net a few days ago and I watched almost immediately. If you frequent this blog, no doubt you've already seen it. To me it was just "OK", and as someone who has been wary of a 4th Indiana Jones from the get go, this trailer really doesn't excite.

The Good

- Ford doesn't look half as old as I expected which is good. I no longer doubt his viability to reprise his role as Indy. That's good, or this affair might have been painful and awkward.

-The exchange: Kid: "You're a teacher?!" ... Indy: "Part time." A sign that the type humor present in the previous installments has survived. This exchange reminded me of the joke in Last Crusade where Indy (in the classroom) exclaims "... and X never EVER marks the spot" only to exclaim later on in Venice "X marks the spot!" The humor in the fact that Indy is not an orthodox archeologist is one of the most fun aspects of his character. To exclaim that he is a part-time teacher, to me, is comical.

-The warehouse from Raiders revisited. Long shrouded in mystery from its single, brief appearance at the end of the first film, if there was anything that was worthy of exploring further, this was it.

The Bad

- The age jokes. Perhaps not explicit in the trailer, you know they are coming. "Not as easy as it used to be." One or two is all fine and good, but if this becomes a running gag throughout... Ford may as well look old to boot.

- Aliens. This has been rumored to be a central plot point for a long time and I recently ran across a toy advertisement that seemed to substantiate the rumors about the skulls themselves. Maybe its just me, but when I think Indiana Jones, I don't think aliens. The stories have always focused more on myth, historical religious artifacts, etc. From the trailer it would appear that aliens may be tied to some kind of Mayan or Aztec religion element in the film, and it may work, but I remain very skeptical. We'll see. "Aliens. Why did it have to be aliens."


Come May we'll find out everything. Hopefully it will be an enjoyable movie, because I'll be really disappointed if its an epic mess. Ever since the Phantom Menace trailer, I remain skeptical. Even the worst films can look good in trailer form.

Thursday, February 14, 2008

2007's Dragon Wars: "Terribly" Entertaining

Every now and then a movie comes along that seemingly defies description; a movie that is really bad, but is so entertaining because of it that in the end you aren't even sure if you liked or disliked it. 2007's Dragon Wars is just such a beast and while I recommend it to movie buffs, let me be perfectly clear - this movie IS TERRIBLE!

And how! Where to begin? Well, first off, Dragon Wars (or D-War as it also called because I assume it sounds edgy and cool!) is a Korean sequel movie... set in America... starring Americans... apparently doing American things. They even speak English (no dubbing here) and, despite all that, I still had no clue what the hell was happening. But one thing was absolutely clear and that was the fact that this movie was EPIC! (Factoid: D-War set a record of grossing $20.3 million in South Korea in its first five days in theaters.) Seriously, D-War practically reaches out of the television and slaps you in the face just to let you know. It basically just lets you know that its bad. Really bad.

The plot's confusion starts immediately, reinforced with an immediate 10 year flashback by a character we have not been formally introduced to. It also doesn't help one iota that during said flashback there is another 1000 year flashback that attempts to set the stage for EPIC dragon battle in the here and now. Let me attempt to paint the picture.

There are these dragon gods of which one is good and one is evil (Buraki), hell bent on attaining possession of some spirit-thingy called the Yeo-ui-ju (pronounced YOO-EE-JOO) which will allow it to rule the world forever. Its celestial army was thwarted 1000 years ago and now it has another chance to possess the Yeo-ui-ju. The catch is that Yeo-ui-ju inhabits a beautiful girl at birth and she just happens to be the star-crossed lover of the main character to whom we are never formally introduced. In fact, they loved each other 1000 years ago too! Except back then they were Korean living in ancient Korea and the whole setting seemed better suited for all this dragon nonsense. (For a complete summation of this plot, go here)

Ok, so now that we've finished the crazy marathon of flashbacks, we learn that this mysterious mentor-guide guy (who reminded me of Mortal Kombat's Chang Tsung and played by an obviously desperate for work Robert Forester) has survived 1000 years and is now ready to help our hero defeat the evil dragon in Los Angeles where the new Yeo-ui-ju infested girl lives. And cue the chaos!

This might be one of the highest production value pieces of movie garbage I have ever seen! Seriously, it looks as if they spared no expense as the movie looks fantastic (especially the dragons and the battle sequences) but it is completely counter-balanced by a paper-thin and incomprehensible plot, oddly stereotyped characters that make you wonder how Koreans really perceive Americans and finally just plain bad acting. Watching this movie, it was amazing to me that Michael Bay had absolutely no involvement whatsoever. How could it be so terrible when its production value was pretty high? (Factoid: Dragon Wars or D-Wars was the highest budgeted film in Korea for 2007 with a final budget of $75 million) They made a really expensive comedy and I have to admit that I laughed the whole way through. It was a riot!

If you're looking for a good, non-serious flick to watch on a Saturday night while drinking with your friends, this IS the movie you want. Do not buy it. Do not rent it. Find a way to obtain it free of charge and enjoy watching an example of what the end of the Hollywood writer's strike has spared us from in an alternate future. I'd rate this movie but I have to agree with Korean critic Kim Bong-sok who apparently said that this movie is "below criticism". Well said, good sir. Well said.

Thursday, February 7, 2008

Y: The Last Man - A Must Read!


The journey has finally come to an end. Brian K. Vaughan's apocalyptic epic Y: The Last Man ended last month capping a 60 issue run. Riveting from the very first page to the very last, the conclusion of the series ends my journey as a faithful reader. And boy, what a ride!

Way back when I first started blogging (back on MySpace) I wrote up a fairly lengthy introductory blog about Y, laying out it's seemingly absurd premise for those unfamiliar and describing what an intelligent, witty and uncompromising comic it was. So now it seems fitting that I sit down and write once more about it as a complete work. And for those unfamiliar I can only say you really need to give this title a try, comic book reader or not, because what Mr. Vaughan (Ex Machina, Runaways, tv's Lost) has done is set a very high bar with a very non-traditional type of comic book story. Its contemporary, compelling and skillfully written. In short, its worth your time.

Not so much with the audience that reads this blog, but in general, when a comic book fan starts talking about said material, the reaction from non-comic readers involves the "look", perhaps a scoff and often times a chuckle. Yeah, yeah... comics are kid's stuff, we know... except that they aren't so much. Let me just say that if I were a parent with a kid reading today's comics, rest assured I'd be monitoring, not necessarily to censor, but certainly to better understand and guide my child. Bottom line, if you have read a comic book (and I'm not talking Archie) you know that they are really aimed at a mature audience. With Y, and Vaughan's work in general, this is absolutely true as it deals with a ton of social issues, most prominently gender and sexuality, human nature and psychology.

I like Vaughan's description of Y best: it is a serious take on that common teenage boy fantasy of being the last man on Earth (so that you could have all the women to yourself, of course) and exploring the consequences of such a situation. When a worldwide "plague" strikes dead every single male in the animal world at the very same moment, amateur escape-artist Yorick Brown and his pet monkey Ampersand discover that, somehow, they are the only remaining males on the planet. And thats bad... more than you know! Once you get past the obvious dilemma effectively preventing further propagation of the human race, you start to realize that the majority of factory work is done by men, the transportation industry is predominantly men, etc, etc, etc. The very structure of our modern society is brought into focus and the tough question is posed - could our society, left with only women to run it, function? It's not a dig at women, but rather a legitimate, well explored question.

Yorick thus becomes the eyes through which we explore this extreme scenario. Accompanied by a body guard, a mysterious Culper Ring agent known only as 355, and geneticist Dr. Allison Mann, he sets off on a worldwide quest to find his girlfriend Beth (literally a world away in Australia doing anthropological studies) and help find the means to restore humanity's future. No, it does not involve "making it" with every woman he encounters. Quite the opposite. As the last man on Earth, he is a target of those who would use him for their own desires and those who would see him dead with the rest of the men.

Through his journey's we explore the politics of gender and gender roles, identity and purpose, religion, philosophy, relationships and, most importantly, human nature. Even in the absence of men, some things never change. However, there are a LOT more deadbeats. *wink* All the while Vaughan keeps us wondering what caused all the men to die. It obviously wasn't war or global warming, so we realize that something really big is at work and its the anticipation and speculation that keep you coming back for more. You want to know, but as was my experience, eventually the answer to that question seems to take a back seat. How would this all end up? Humanity is pretty much staring its extincting square in the face.

Vaughan weaves together a hell of a story that, for me, even challenged my hopes for how it would resolve itself. In the end you suddenly realize that there is so much more to Y than is immediately apparent. It is those deeper aspects to the story that really makes it great. He is also a very enjoyable writer. I appreciated his wit, pop-culture references and especially his off-the-cuff, non-apologetic approach to his story; political correctness is a waste of time and Vaughan pays it no mind... and its great!

There are more mysteries to Y than simply what caused all the men to die. They, too, come into much clearer focus as the story moves along, one prominent example is the true name of Agent 355, to which Vaughan has admitted that clues are spread throughout the series. It is up to the reader to piece it all together. And absolutely everything in the plot has meaning, often not spelled out in clear terms. How does it all turn out in the end? I will never tell. You absolutely have to read it for yourself. The good news is this - of all the people I have introduced to Y over these past 5 years, both men and women, not one of them has had anything bad to say about it. It's universally accessible in my opinion.

As a complete work, Y: The Last Man stands alone for me and challenges the most renowned titles in the comic world, past and present. Honestly, its on par with the best novels, television and film have to offer and better than 95% of it. It has it all - action, romance, adventure, science, religion, politics, history, emotional highs and lows. It's thoroughly entertaining and brings with it a refreshing level of intelligence that sets a very high bar for future writers. Hopefully it is a sign of things to come for new titles in the future. I sincerely hope Y is not the last of its kind.

Monday, February 4, 2008

Two Reasons I'm Psyched for DOOMSDAY


1. It's from Neil Marshall, director of the excellent The Descent.

2. The trailer makes it look like a chick-powered Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome.

Watch the trailer here.